• Home
  • News
    • People moves
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • Caribbean
    • Domicile
    • Europe
    • Latin America
    • North America
    • Middle East
    • US
    • US
    • UK
  • Products
    • Funds
    • Pensions
    • Platforms
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Private Banking
    • Citizenship
    • Taxation
  • Fintech
  • Regulation
  • ESG
  • Expats
  • In Depth
  • Special Reports
  • Directory
  • Video
  • Advertise with us
  • Directory
  • Events
  • European Fund Selector
  • Newsletters
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
  • Advertise with us
  • Directory
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      International Investment Nordic Forum 2021

      International Investment is delighted to announce the 2021 International Investment Nordic Forum which will take place on Tuesday March 9, at 9am (GMT). This curated virtual event will be broadcast live and will feature a series of fund manager interviews and presentations, as well as interviews with some of the Nordic regions top fund selectors.

      • Date: 09 Mar 2021
      • ONLINE, ONLINE
      View all events
  • European Fund Selector
International Investment
International Investment

Sponsored by

Sharing Alpha
  • Home
  • News
  • Products
  • Fintech
  • Regulation
  • ESG
  • Expats
  • In Depth
  • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Alternative

Why shadows still linger over Mifid II's Cost & Charges regime

Why shadows still linger over Mifid II's Cost & Charges regime
  • Haider Mannan
  • 30 May 2019
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  

April marked somewhat of a fork in the road for asset managers still perplexed by how best to report transaction costs to investors under Mifid II's Costs & Charges directive. The time for further pontification is, however, well and truly over. As of 30 April, new rules mean that the costs for trades actually completed, as opposed to expected, need to be reported under Mifid II.

Put simply, asset managers have to assess the bid/offer spread between two possible prices, and the difference between those prices. The first number is the price of the trade that the fund manager decides to buy or sell at, and the second is the actual price of the transaction which includes tricky to work out implicit costs such as commissions. The problem is that the rules, despite having all the right intentions to deliver transparency to investors, have not really accounted for the challenges involved in calculating implicit costs for the more complex trades.

Related articles

  • Mifid II: Why outsourcing reporting should not come back to bite the buy-side
  • How Mifid II can become Mifid III
  • Driving down investor costs: Can buy-side firms learn from the data-fuelled world of F1?
  • EC delays Mifid II implementation to January 2018

As such, the way certain asset managers have represented costs has, until now at least, inadvertently made it look as though they have not acted in the best interests of investors. In fact, the methodology they have been using to construct these calculations has often been giving investors a false view of performance. The issue centres around selecting the best calculation methodology to adopt for each trade. Do fund managers go with a bid/offer spread based methodology, or slippage type calculations during periods of higher volatility? 

For straightforward calculations on say equities, for example, a slippage methodology can be easily applied. Where difficulties start to emerge is with the more complicated derivatives trades - as it is far harder to work out the implicit costs due to the sheer volume of information required. Take Delta One products as a prime case in point. An asset manager would need around seven or eight more data points before even attempting the calculation. On top of this, the calculation methodology for Delta One instruments is very different from a standard equity trade because it is hard to decipher what is multiplicative and what is additive. Due to the non-specific nature of the original Cost and Charges rules, they do not allow for the intricate nuances of how instruments like this are traded across all the asset classes.

This has, to all intense and purposes, left many asset managers caught between a rock and a hard place. Many still haven't found a way to accurately display implicit costs for highly complicated trades, while at the same time face a race against the time to deliver fully transparent transaction cost reports. And there is immense pressure on some firms, especially those using a larger number of platforms, to meet the regulatory requirements. The answer to this predicament is far from straightforward, but there are some immediate steps the investment management community can take.

In a new era of regulatory oversight in transaction reporting, it is safe to assume that any firm that selects, refines, and deploys the use of data most effectively will be well placed. Similarly, those asset managers that get a better grasp of the intricate detail of the costs associated with their more difficult to execute trades, will also be in a position to report accurately to their investors. After all, the specifics of the highly convoluted derivative trades mean that access to a meaningful benchmark and a more in-depth knowledge of the market structure could hold the key to finally meeting Mifid II's transparency goal for Cost and Charges. 

 

Haider Mannan is a data consultant and regulatory specialist at SIX

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Alternative
  • Haider Mannan
  • SIX
  • Technology
  • Regulation
  • Trading

More on Alternative

Janus Henderson Investors launches multi-strategy UCITS fund

  • Alternative
  • 03 June 2020
Law firm comments Esma shorting policy amid Coronavirus crisis

  • Alternative
  • 19 March 2020
Columbia Threadneedle suspends dealing in retail property fund

  • Alternative
  • 19 March 2020
AMX adds two to Irish operations

  • Alternative
  • 18 March 2020
Sweden ditches amortisation requirement in response to Coronavirus

  • Alternative
  • 18 March 2020
Back to Top

Most read

More than 250,000 expats left Saudi Arabia in 3Q2020
More than 250,000 expats left Saudi Arabia in 3Q2020
FSCS warns industry of £1bn compensation bill
FSCS warns industry of £1bn compensation bill
Dubai regulator to develop cryptocurrency framework
Dubai regulator to develop cryptocurrency framework
Jersey Finance partners with Durrell trust to launch global rewilding fund
Jersey Finance partners with Durrell trust to launch global rewilding fund
Aegon UK partners HSBC Global AM to embed ESG across in-house default funds
Aegon UK partners HSBC Global AM to embed ESG across in-house default funds
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading