Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) has released its second annual ranking of climate change ‘leaders and laggards', following engagement under its Climate Impact Pledge.
Introduced in 2016, the Climate Impact Pledge is LGIM's commitment to engage with the largest companies across six sectors identified as key to meeting global climate change goals: oil and gas, mining, electric utilities, autos, food retail and financials.
This year's results reveal improvements in the average scores of all six sectors, with sectors under most public scrutiny, such as oil and gas, utilities and autos, making great strides in disclosures and targets. The increase in average scores has also been seen across all the main regions analysed, including in the US, UK, Europe and Asia Pacific.
However, LGIM's research also uncovered a significant divergence between the leaders and laggards within the same sectors, as well as signs of stagnation within sectors such as financials and food retailers. The divergence within the US is particularly stark as companies face a dichotomy between the federal stance on the Paris Agreement and other global, state-level and local initiatives to address climate issues.
LGIM reports has led to tangible actions and changes in board-level discussions about building resilient strategies in the face of fast-changing political, technological and consumer trends. As part of LGIM's responsibility as a constructive long-term investor, the Pledge aims to "name and fame" companies that have taken a lead in each of the sectors.
In June 2018, LGIM voted against and divested out of eight companies from the Future World fund range for persistent inaction to address climate risk.
Following LGIM's updated assessment in 2019, five new companies will be voted against and divested from the Future World range due to unsatisfactory results: ExxonMobil Corporation, Hormel Foods, Korean Electric Power Corporation, Kroger and Metlife. These names are in addition to China Construction Bank, Rosneft Oil, Japan Post Holdings, Subaru, Loblaw and Sysco Corporation, all of whom remain engaged but who have yet to take the substantive actions to warrant re-instatement.