Should investors care about political risk in 2018?
An unpredictable political environment in the US, ongoing geopolitical tensions, as well as elections in Italy and a number of emerging market countries are among numerous political risks facing markets this year. The question is: how should fixed income investors price in these risks, if at all?
Political risk did not matter in 2017 – bad news came and went without causing much alarm in markets and efforts to hedge portfolios against event risks generally did not pay off. Buying protection on the South Korean won, for example, did not benefit investors despite an escalation in tensions over North Korea. Similarly, underweighting Spanish government bonds did not reap rewards as there was minimal fallout from Catalonia’s unofficial independence referendum in Spain.
The lack of volatility around political events in 2017 has led some participants to question whether a more relaxed approach should be taken to bond market risk this year. However, we strongly disagree with this notion and always prefer to err on the side of caution. Even with hindsight, given the repeated missile launches by North Korea in 2017, we would have probably spent the same amount of money on insurance against a potential geopolitical crisis.
So, what are the political risk events on the horizon for this year? For emerging markets, it is all about elections: Russia, Colombia, Indonesia, Mexico, Malaysia, Brazil and Thailand – which together represent more than a 50% weighting in JPMorgan’s emerging market bond indices – are all scheduled to hold presidential, general or local elections in 2018.
The build-up to such elections often leads to price distortion and opportunities for medium-term investors – as fixed income markets can overreact ahead of elections. This was the case in South Africa last year before the African National Congress leadership contest. Ultimately, market volatility gave us the opportunity to re-enter the local bond market at a more attractive level.
Currencies can also be affected by political risk. A current example is the Mexican peso: not only is Mexico bracing itself for the possibility of leftist presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador winning July’s presidential election, but it is also facing the nearer-term threat of the US withdrawing from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). This backdrop leaves Mexican assets vulnerable to further political headline risk in the short term.
However, political risk will not be confined to just emerging market countries in 2018, it will also be a major theme in developed markets. In the US, uncertainty persists over whether the Trump administration can deliver on its pre-election promises. While tax reform has been delivered, actual fiscal stimulus and healthcare reform continue to be pushed back.
On the international stage, the US administration will enter challenging NAFTA renegotiations with Canada and Mexico, a prospect that seems to have weighed down on the US dollar recently.
Lastly, concerns over rising populist forces in Europe have receded, but risks remain with elections due in Italy on 4 March – while noise surrounding the UK’s exit from the European Union is likely to continue throughout 2018.
All this makes for a highly interesting political environment that will offer opportunities, but where we will have to react quickly. Short-term price dislocation should only be exploited if the medium-term fundamental investment thesis remains solid.
Arif Husain is portfolio manager for the T.Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund.
More on Equities
