• Home
  • News
    • People moves
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • Caribbean
    • Domicile
    • Europe
    • Latin America
    • North America
    • Middle East
    • US
    • US
    • UK
  • Products
    • Funds
    • Pensions
    • Platforms
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Private Banking
    • Citizenship
    • Taxation
  • Fintech
  • Regulation
  • ESG
  • Expats
  • In Depth
  • Special Reports
  • Directory
  • Video
  • Advertise with us
  • Directory
  • Events
  • European Fund Selector
  • Newsletters
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
  • Advertise with us
  • Directory
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      International Investment Nordic Forum 2021

      International Investment is delighted to announce the 2021 International Investment Nordic Forum which will take place on Tuesday March 9, at 9am (GMT). This curated virtual event will be broadcast live and will feature a series of fund manager interviews and presentations, as well as interviews with some of the Nordic regions top fund selectors.

      • Date: 09 Mar 2021
      • ONLINE, ONLINE
      event logo
      Sustainable Investment Festival 2021

      The Sustainable Investment Festival will run online from 22-25 June and will include thought-provoking presentations from renowned keynote speakers, innovative breakout events and sessions specifically tailored to meet the information needs of fund selectors, financial advisers, pension consultants, trustees and scheme managers.

      • Date: 22 Jun 2021
      • Online, Online
      View all events
  • European Fund Selector
International Investment
International Investment

Sponsored by

Sharing Alpha
  • Home
  • News
  • Products
  • Fintech
  • Regulation
  • ESG
  • Expats
  • In Depth
  • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Investments

Out-of-pocket investors welcome news FSCS could scrap £50,000 comp limit

Out-of-pocket investors welcome news FSCS could scrap £50,000 comp limit
  • Helen Burggraf
  • 29 September 2016
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  

News that the UK’s Financial Services Compensation Scheme’s current £50,000 limit on the payout to victims of bad financial advice could be scrapped has given some previously-discouraged out-of-pocket investors cause for optimism, they and their advisers say. 

Although some say they are beginning to wonder if they will ever see so much as a penny back from the tens of thousands of pounds of savings they lost as a result of being badly advised, they say the thought that if they do win they will not be limited to receiving an amount that, in some cases, is considerably less than they originally had invested, is at least encouraging.

Related articles

  • FSCS chief executive Mark Neale steps down
  • Industry experts slam UK chancellor over pension tax relief
  • Fresh blow hits UAE insurance providers, as Central Bank cracks down
  • Australia’s PictureWealth seeks financial advisory clients for its ‘welfie’-taking personal finance app

The news that the FSCS limit might be scrapped came in a monthly blog published yesterday, which had been written by FSCS chief executive Mark Neale.

The FSCS is, of course, the UK’s financial safety net of last resort, which steps in to help victims of failed UK regulated financial services businesses when other sources of potential redress have been exhausted – for example, when a company has gone into administration, without any assets to speak of.

Among those who said he was glad to see formal recognition that the £50,000 limit is too low was Ron Leeman, a British citizen now living in Thailand who lost his life’s savings of £115,000 through a UK QROPS trustee which recommended that it be invested in a fund marketed by a now-defunct Australian fund manager, LM Investment Management. LMIM collapsed in 2013, taking with it the retirement savings of countless investors around the world.

ron-leeman-3

Leeman,  pictured, who is 66 years old and who had planned to live out his days in Thailand, said he is now “actively considering having to move back to the UK to find work” because he is struggling to make ends meet in Thailand.

“I saved all my life to have a happy retirement, and that has been taken away from me,” he said.

Rachel Papworth, a British investor who says she lost in the ballpark of around £100,000, after being advised to put it into LM Investment Management, via the now-failed Brooklands Trustees by a UK adviser who subsequently went abroad and now, she believes, is still working as an adviser elsewhere in Europe, said she was also encouraged by the news.

“The £50,000 limit on FSCS compensation is too low to protect pensions,” she said.

“The government is rightly keen to encourage people to save for retirement, but I saved my hard-earned money prudently, and I’ve lost it all. I’m gutted to have lost the safe future I planned for.”

Neale: ‘Little logic’

In his blog, Neale noted that there was “little logic to protecting retirement savings in insurance products without limit”, yet at the same time restricting protection for mis-selling to £50,000.

“This is confusing for consumers and corrodes confidence,” he said.

“And it leaves consumers with retirement pots in excess of £50,000 in a quandary, because it makes no sense to break the pot up for the purposes of seeking advice. An adviser needs to see the full picture.”

He went on to note that there was a “sound case for harmonising retirement savings limits”, and that FSCS research had shown some 60% of British MPs supported the idea of harmonisation.

Good idea ‘in principle’…

Damon Parker, a founding partner of the London law firm, Harcus-Sinclair, which,  as reported here in July,  is representing a group of aggrieved investors based in Asia known as the LM Investor Victim Centre (LMIVC), said he supported Neale’s idea “in principle”, but noted that there could be problems in funding such a scheme.

“I support the idea in principle because I have seen many cases where people’s life savings have been wiped out through no fault of their own, but, because they have been unable to seek redress from anyone who is still solvent, they have been unable to recover their losses, and so have been restricted to recovering £50,000 from the FSCS,” he said.

“I do, however, have a concern about how an infinite indemnity scheme of last resort would be funded. The financial services advisory community, which already grumbles about its FSCS levy, would be unlikely to wish to pay more into the fund.

“A possible alternative would be to require financial services firms – those that create and manage financial products, as well as those that market and advise on them – to carry sufficient insurance on sensible terms.

“The usual reason for the FSCS needing to be called on is that financial services firms, unlike solicitors and accountants, tend to have insurance that protects them only for the year in which the claim is asserted against them. If they stop insuring themselves, or their insurers exclude a risk that they are worried about, the consumer is unprotected, and their advisers or the scheme operator protect themselves from being sued because of their financial weakness.

“If, however, the insurance was on terms that protected the consumer against the actions of the firm in the year that was covered by the insurance, the FSCS would find that it was called on much less frequently.”

‘Timely’ to consider scrapping cap

Timothy Hampson, associate solicitor with Wixted & Co, another London-based legal practice which, he says, specialises in negligence claims involving financial services companies, says Neale’s observations about the FSCS’s shortcomings is timely, since “we are increasingly finding that potential defendants are uninsured and unable to meet claims, so the FSCS is a forum which clients have to use much more often than they used to”.

He adds: “The inconsistency described by Mark Neale is something that we have noted for a number of years now. It would be a great boost to the victims of negligent financial advice if the FSCS were to follow its CEO’s proposal and increase the limit of its compensation from £50,000.

“Sadly, in many cases that we have seen, the compensation that the FSCS can award is simply not enough, and leaves investors out of pocket with no other avenue for further recovery.

“The issue is compounded by the fact that many professional indemnity insurers often seek to avoid cover and refuse to indemnify firms, [which] leaves the FSCS and consumers to carry the cost.”

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Investments
  • Rest of World
  • UK
  • Financial Services Compensation Scheme
  • FSCS
  • LM Investment Management

More on Investments

US female investors reluctant to pay a financial adviser - report

  • Investments
  • 18 February 2021
Jersey regulator says new Woodford firm has not applied for authorisation

  • Investments
  • 18 February 2021
CISI launches anti-money laundering partnership with Qatari regulator

  • Regulation
  • 16 February 2021
Cyprus tells investment summit it's in 'prime position' for EU markets access

  • Investments
  • 05 February 2021
EFAMA urges 12-month extension to implenting new PRIIPS rules

  • Regulation
  • 04 February 2021
Back to Top

Most read

Global UHNWI population to grow by 27% over the next five years: Knight Frank
Global UHNWI population to grow by 27% over the next five years: Knight Frank
Amati Global Investors launches strategic metals fund
Amati Global Investors launches strategic metals fund
Aviva announces exit from Turkey
Aviva announces exit from Turkey
Erratic Bitcoin leaves industry divided as Square invests $170m
Erratic Bitcoin leaves industry divided as Square invests $170m
St James's Place predicts £200bn AuM by 2025 despite job cuts
St James's Place predicts £200bn AuM by 2025 despite job cuts
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading