• Home
  • News
    • People moves
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Canada
    • Caribbean
    • Domicile
    • Europe
    • Latin America
    • North America
    • Middle East
    • US
    • US
    • UK
  • Products
    • Funds
    • Pensions
    • Platforms
    • Insurance
    • Investments
    • Private Banking
    • Citizenship
    • Mortgages
    • Taxation
  • Fintech
  • Regulation
  • In Depth
  • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Directory
  • Advertise with us
  • Events
  • Middle East Hub
  • Newsletters
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
  • Advertise with us
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      View all events
  • Middle East Hub
International Investment
International Investment

Sponsored by

Sharing Alpha
  • Home
  • News
  • Products
  • Fintech
  • Regulation
  • In Depth
  • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Directory
  • Taxation

South African football agent's £1.2m tax avoidance own goal

South African football agent's £1.2m tax avoidance own goal
  • Gary Robinson
  • 26 July 2018
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  

A former top football agent, who helped bring some of Africa’s brightest talent into the spotlight, has has lost his £1.2 million tax battle with UK’s HMRC.

The landmark case, heard at the Upper Tribunal, shows that Jerome Anderson and eight others failed in their attempt to avoid what the UK tax authorities described as “large amounts” of tax.

Related articles

  • HMRC in ‘landmark’ ruling against avoidance scheme used by wealthy
  • Goldcrest tax avoidance film scheme loses £44m appeal
  • HMRC wins ‘landmark’ case against Root2 stock market scheme promoter
  • HMRC wins £79m tax avoidance case against Goldman Sachs

The scheme involved investments in the recruitment and training of young footballers at the Bafana Soccer Academy in South Africa, in which Anderson attempted to use this investment to claim a £3m as an artificial trading loss to reduce his tax bill.

The tribunal found that Anderson’s activities were more like those of an investor and this didn’t show that he was trading and decided that he could not claim a trading loss and therefore the tax was due.

Landmark case
This was the first case to consider s74B Income Tax Act 2007 which is an anti-avoidance provision that denies an individual any sideways loss relief claimed where that individual carries on a trade in a “non-active” capacity and where that loss arises in connection with tax avoidance arrangements.

Penny Ciniewicz, HMRC’s director general for customer compliance, said: “The court has made it clear that these schemes don’t work. Our public services rely on everyone paying their taxes and it’s unfair for people not to pay their share.

Ciniewicz urged any individuals that are “caught up in tax avoidance and who wants to put it behind them” to come forward now and “settle what they owe”.

HMRC’s victory is their ninth out of ten tax avoidance cases taken to court, with many more settling what they owe before reaching that stage.

  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Taxation
  • UK
  • HMRC
  • Tax
  • tax avoidance

More on Taxation

US FATCA crackdown pushing demand for tax advice

  • Taxation
  • 27 November 2019
Financial advisers puzzled by nil rate band rules

  • Taxation
  • 27 November 2019
Wayne Rooney, Jimmy Carr and other stars win £263m HMRC battle

  • Taxation
  • 19 November 2019
Panama 'partially compliant' with global tax transparency standard

  • Taxation
  • 15 November 2019
Canada shares almost a million bank records with the IRS under FATCA

  • Taxation
  • 14 November 2019
Back to Top

Most read

EXCLUSIVE: deVere agrees sale of South Africa business
EXCLUSIVE: deVere agrees sale of South Africa business
US FATCA crackdown pushing demand for tax advice
US FATCA crackdown pushing demand for tax advice
Kuwait to ban diabetic expats
Kuwait to ban diabetic expats
DeVere to close Barcelona office
DeVere to close Barcelona office
Cayman National Bank IOM confirms customer account details stolen in hack
Cayman National Bank IOM confirms customer account details stolen in hack
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017